Before you read. Looking at an article in The Post. I notice the heading is in all caps, and one word is colored instead of black. there is also a logo above the heading. and then a large picture below the heading. There is another small heading under the picture. and then the actual article. within the article there is a quote that is pulled out and made larger probably to emphasis the point. and lastly there in another picture incorporated into the text.
Summary: Bernhardt's article about displaying writing visually and structurally. He discribes the different ways texts are seen. One way he discribes in visually in which tables, images, are added to a text to make the point stronger to the reader. the second way is in the structure. This way the reader still has to read all of the text to gain knowledge, but the organization is in a way that adds meaning to the text itself.
Synthesis: This article can compare to McCloud because it talks about using images to explain points in writing. McCloud and Bernhardt take different approaches to the subject but both make the point that sometime there are deeper meanings in writing than can be seen just by reading, that sometimes require readers to make connections. This article also connects to Bergers idea of perceiving. Different people will perceive the same thing differently based on who they are. I think this connects with Bernhardt because he says how different visual styles in writing appeal to different types of readers.
Response
|
Quotation
|
Thoughts: I thought that Bernhart was an interesting essay because I liked reading how different visuals made reading more appealing. I used several ideas from Bernhart into my own writing pieces. I used images, charts, and boxes to added dynamic appeal to my writing, I think it definitely helps and keeps the reader guessing.
No comments:
Post a Comment